1. varis78 liked this
  2. benny-bubbles liked this
  3. istarkano liked this
  4. lordgibbon said: Yes. It’s distinctve and useful for any preformer themed creature.
  5. lordgibbon liked this
  6. josephrandisi said: No. Too classical fantasy. I prefer Mtg fantasy to remain mtg fantasy. Warlocks is an exception because that’s MUCH broader than bard.
  7. philippesaner said: Yes.
  8. tabatkins said: Yes. Bard is a D&D class, so it’s well known. There’s also good possibility for fun one-off tribal equipments, as music instruments.
  9. orca-iguana reblogged this from markrosewater and added:
    If warlock and wizard get to be types, then yes, so should bard.
  10. orca-iguana liked this
  11. strain-of-thought reblogged this from markrosewater and added:
    I would love for all the d&d base classes to be subtypes, personally.
  12. lhurgyof-blog said: Artist, Bard, and Rogue all fit imo
  13. monorayjak reblogged this from markrosewater and added:
    BARD!
  14. monorayjak liked this
  15. bidoofvselite-four liked this
  16. hextech-bros liked this
  17. lice666 said: Yes
  18. tevans-living-life liked this
  19. zzzzsman said: It is a sort of class
  20. ulthwithian said: If Noble and Warlock are creature types, so should Bard.
  21. manateeprince liked this
  22. ulthwithian liked this
  23. thisusernameisridiculous said: I feel like it would fall under Artist
  24. levthelurker liked this
  25. blast-seeker said: Yes please
  26. bored-umm liked this
  27. magicalhobo72 liked this
  28. retroactivebakeries said: “Artist” would probably be better, but some kind of type to capture that would be good
  29. oneiromantis said: Or bring back townsfolk.
  30. rodimuses liked this
  31. death-burst reblogged this from markrosewater
  32. jacebeleren reblogged this from markrosewater
  33. gunpowderer said: No. According to my Tax Returns, it’s a job, not a race.
  34. scottydsco said: Yes!
  35. oneiromantis said: yes
  36. masterstrix said: A music mage is cool and seeing other artists as well that could be spread over all colors would be great.
  37. masterstrix liked this
  38. fireiord liked this
  39. strawberryrat liked this
  40. tonyredgravedmc reblogged this from markrosewater
  41. tonyredgravedmc said: Question, by general definition, can Bard encompass non-musical artist? Like, for example, could Painter’s Servant technically be a Scarecrow Bard? If so, 100% make Bard a creature type. I was pleased with the inclusion of Warlock
  42. tonyredgravedmc liked this
  43. dude1818 said: I don’t have strong feelings, but I’m not opposed
  44. leonelylion liked this
  45. themartiangeek said: I think it should. We don’t have a class for magic musicians, or musicians (or artists) or any type, It could be a good excuse to have more characters who cast magic through music, it’s the only standard D&D class that doesn’t have a MTG equivalent, and the trope of the wandering bard seems fairly prevalent in fantasy settings.
  46. deadinthestreet said: Yes
  47. forrestlupin liked this
  48. geckoqueen25852 liked this
  49. orzhovplaneswalker said: Yes!!
  50. markrosewater posted this
    Is there a reason Bard hasn't become a creature type? There's almost a dozen creatures that are either named bard or are...